Most higher education institutions continue to struggle with collecting and reporting on comprehensive, up-to-date faculty activity information — a key requirement for accreditation, faculty reviews, promotion and tenure processes, and strategic reporting. And these activities are not optional. The only question is: how will you do them? Without a digital solution, institutions spend too much time hunting for missing data and making numerous requests of faculty throughout the year to manually update their records.
Institutions need data
“The whole idea behind Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures) is ‘capture data once, use it infinitely.’ It’s about collecting this information that faculty are plagued with having to provide over and over and over again — typically 6-12 times per year — furnishing the same information to different stakeholders,” said Matt Bartel, Chief Product Officer for Watermark. “If you’re asking faculty for basically the same information multiple times, what are the odds you’re going to get the same information over time when different people ask? And what’s the likelihood of actually getting the information when you ask? We’ve made it so that we just ask faculty for it once, and then it can be spit out of the system in different formats and templates.”
“It’s not just about efficiency — it’s about actually getting the information and having more accurate information,” Bartel said.
In a Watermark survey conducted this spring, 69% of respondents from Master’s Colleges & Universities indicated they’re still using paper-based, homegrown, or folder/file management solutions to manage faculty review processes. These types of processes have proven challenging as faculty and staff made the transition to remote work and online teaching, and accelerated the shift to digital systems for important university processes. The ideal faculty activity reporting system not only eases the burden of managing massive amounts of data for administrators and staff, but puts faculty first, recognizing that the time and effort required to enter teaching, research, and service information into the system is significant.
“The bar has been set by business-to-consumer applications like TurboTax,” Bartel said. “How often are people actually interacting with Microsoft Word files in their personal lives? They fill things out on the web. This is just part of embracing technology, as by and large faculty now expect.”
Designed to make data entry 5x faster
While Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures) by Watermark has already helped higher education institutions across the globe streamline and simplify their faculty activity reporting and review processes, it was clear that there was a significant opportunity to save faculty time and enable administrators to get more out of the data more quickly. Watermark’s team worked closely with its partner institutions to gather feedback on the problems they face in faculty activity reporting, and faculty buy-in was consistently named the number one challenge in getting a digital system up and running quickly. When faculty are asked to spend as much as eight hours simply entering their CV data into a database, it’s not surprising when other work takes priority.
CV Imports removes the majority of that burden from faculty by using a guided experience to streamline the process of entering the accomplishments and credentials detailed in a faculty member’s curriculum vitae. Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures)’ new technology makes data entry five times faster, so faculty members are free to focus their time on teaching, service, and research efforts.
“Other solutions have been very focused on trying to simplify data entry in an evolutionary manner to make things incrementally better.
“Everybody had been focused on dealing with a single item on a CV at a time. That already is the wrong paradigm,” Bartel said. “We took a different view on the problem. Our radical rethink involved looking more broadly across items.”
“We realized that there is more than one item per section, and we can save a lot of time by leveraging the fact that common things are grouped together in a section – here are all of my books, my journal articles, my presentations, my committee appointments – and they’re listed sequentially.”
Built on faculty feedback
The Watermark team first developed a basic prototype of CV Imports and gathered feedback from more than 100 faculty members. Their insights helped refine the concept and enhance the user interface, and an enhanced prototype was used in a formal study in the University of Minnesota’s usability lab with a panel of faculty members that included both experienced users of Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures) and individuals who had never used a digital faculty activity reporting solution before. Watermark also established two different cohort groups of administrators and met quarterly to discuss functionality and uncover additional use cases.
“The initial 100 individuals really helped hone the design and the direction of the CV Imports interface,” said Tony Fuger, Product Manager for Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures). “The usability study really helped confirm our hypothesis that this would be a material change, especially for those who had used a faculty activity reporting system in the past, and helped us identify usability issues that we were able to take care of before we got it to the development stage. The cohort groups helped us understand the features and functionality beyond that very specific task that would be needed to be successful on campus. We learned that just allowing faculty to upload their CV and get it into the database wasn’t enough; we also needed to add functionality to allow proxies to do it, and make sure we were catching duplicates along the way as well.”
CV Imports was initially launched to a pilot group of users, who saw significant time savings as faculty easily imported complete CVs and validated the information in around an hour, as opposed to the 8+ hours typically spent copying and pasting the information from a Microsoft Word document.
“We’ve had over 20,000 records entered into the system using the tool within the first month of launch, and users have seen up to 80% time savings,” Fuger said. “For those who have gone through the pain of having to copy and paste, it’s been revolutionary.”
An intuitive interface gets users up and running quickly
Watermark’s CV Imports feature provides faculty, proxies, and administrative users with an intuitive interface to upload their CV document and to easily navigate sections to review and adjust the content and ensure it is mapped accurately. Rather than taking a gradual approach to populating the system with more recent faculty activity data and adding to it over time, CV Imports makes it easier to support more complicated reporting objectives sooner by quickly getting complete data into Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures).
Having all faculty activity information in a central repository eliminates the need for faculty to create new versions of their CV to respond to requests for information, and allows the data to be repurposed multiple ways. Administrators can run diverse reports on the imported data and supplement it with data from integrated online repositories, such as Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ORCID.
Watermark has built a solution that helps create a more accurate, trustworthy, and comprehensive reflection of faculty activities across the institution that can be used to celebrate and showcase accomplishments, make more informed evaluation decisions, and simplify accreditation reporting. In recognition of this drive for innovation, Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures) by Watermark was recently named Overall EdTech Solution of the Year by EdTech Breakthrough, a recognition of the solution’s ability to manage complex, multi-step processes while allowing users to focus on using data to drive improvements rather than simply collecting it. But the team isn’t done innovating, and more enhancements are on the horizon. “Faculty Success (formerly Digital Measures) and faculty activity reporting is just one piece of the puzzle. There’s a bigger framework,” Bartel said. “We’re listening to our clients and leveraging technological advances to solve the problems they face.”